Olaplex Just Made Its Cult-Favorite Treatment Even Better
NewBeauty Facebook Pinterest Instagram Youtube find a doctor Face Adult Acne Antioxidants Anti-Aging Celebrity Chronic Skin Conditions Eye Hydration Hyperpigmentation Makeup View All Eyebrows Eye Color Foundation Fragrance Lip Color Makeovers Male Skin Care Peels Pre-Event Prep Sensitive Skin Skin Care Skin Health Smile Sun Care Treatments Fillers Microneedling Post-Procedure Skin Care Neurotoxins Regenerative Aesthetics Skin Lifting Body Body Sculpting Breasts Butts Cellulite Hair Removal Hands + Nails Legs Pregnancy Find a Doctor Hair Bond Repair Celebrity Dry Hair Frizzy Hair Gray Hair Hair Color Hair Growth Hair Repair Scalp Health Styling + Tips Awards NB100 Awards 15th Annual Beauty Awards 2025 NewBeauty Readers’ Choice Awards Shopping Gift Guides Product Reviews NewBeauty Storefront Wellness Fitness GLP-1s Health Menopause About Us TESTTUBE Search for: Search HomeHairHair Repair Olaplex Just Made Its Cult-Favorite Treatment Even Better Meet No.3PLUS, the next-generation upgrade to the cult favorite. By Hana Hong Published: Mar 5, 2026 We may earn commission from links on this page. Each product featured has been vetted and chosen by our editors. Courtesy of Olaplex If you’ve ever bleached, colored, heat-styled or otherwise pushed your hair to the brink, chances are you’ve encountered Olaplex No.3 Hair Perfector ($34) at some point. Since launching nearly a decade ago, the treatment has become something of a legend in the hair-repair world—the at-home product that helped introduce consumers to the idea that broken hair bonds could actually be rebuilt. Now the brand is revisiting that icon. Olaplex officially unveiled No.3PLUS ($34), the next evolution of the original treatment that helped put the company (and the entire bond-building category) on the map. The new formula promises a faster, more advanced repair experience. Like the original No.3, No.3PLUS is designed as a pre-shampoo treatment, so it’s meant to be applied before you wash your hair. But instead…